Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130614
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 13:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1620-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 91.6
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 139
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 52 84 101 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 90
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 74%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
630GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 24.5
33% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback