Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 03:32
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 96
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 351
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 32.8
30% 34.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 23.3
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 188 195 199 202 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 436
Write 190
Mixed 190
SusWrite 192
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 11.1
72% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 77.2
88% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
58GB free
Firmware: 0006DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 86.6
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 95.5
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD5 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback