HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 465 49% 392 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 36 29% 32.5 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 33 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 165 175 174 173 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 138 Write 171 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 163 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.9 353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 108%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 236GB free Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 72 73 74 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 75.8 Write 79 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 72.5 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 45%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Read 9.8 Write 6.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 0.6 6% 5.35 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 6%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.4 5.3 5.1 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 5.2 8% 5.77 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 33% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 6%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB 4,921 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 34GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 20.2 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 22.9 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G GU512303EP0202 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 20GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	596x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	140x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16