Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5600U 20,423 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 138 40% 73.3 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 65.7 25% 156 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GB 2,407 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 291 292 291 287 289 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 385 Write 294 Mixed 233 SusWrite 291 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 16.6 54% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 248 182% 234 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 99%
Asmt 2115 240GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 223GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 33 34 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 37.8 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 36.3 28% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 4.2 759% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5674-M0-YK0 2x4GB 2,471 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.6 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-5600UIntelBench 50%, 20,423 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,407 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5674-M0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 2,471 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16