Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 20:42
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 627
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 46.9
Parallax 34
26% 37.8 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 42.1
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 31%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$129
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 122 81 88 77 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 471
Write 128
Mixed 202
SusWrite 102
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 33.9
113% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 305
300% 482 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 144%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
34GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 398 404 413 404 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 379
Write 353
Mixed 321
SusWrite 400
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 27.2
82% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 288
237% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
457GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 79 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 77.5
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 25
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 22.8
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback