Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z490 UD AC-Y1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 UD AC-Y1  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$216
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,030
95% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 69.5
60% 72.7 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 68
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 437 438 454 472 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 484
Mixed 399
SusWrite 435
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 53.9
179% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 168 164 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 140
Write 124
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 164
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 2.2
2% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
241GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1156 1461 1464 938 345 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,104
Write 910
Mixed 846
SusWrite 957
214% 954 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 75.3
240% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 1,000
752% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 223%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
773GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 191 192 192 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 148
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 190
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$35
931GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 176 178 178 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 90
SusWrite 174
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
246% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 19.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 8% 91 294 217 60 22" 1680 1050 VSC591E VX2235wm
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B
Typical GA-Z490 UD AC-Y1 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 UD AC-Y1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback