Today's hottest deals

Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 787
69% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX580
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 54.2
27% 47 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 37.1
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1002 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 195 192 195 192 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 487
Write 426
Mixed 242
SusWrite 196
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 43.4
149% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 209
171% 244 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 124 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 114
Write 123
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 125
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 20% 65 330 261 60 17.3" 1920 1080 LGD04E8
History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 31: 3R 3G 7B
Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback