Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 11:51
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 207
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 504
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.9
0% 5.17 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 30 49 17 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 33.6
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 23.2
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
15GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 20 6.8 13 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 129
Write 22
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 21
63% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.3
206% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback