Today's hottest deals

Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime13 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 98
2-Core 196
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 720
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX580
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 50
Parallax 51.9
26% 44.5 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 37.2
35% 43.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1002 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 173 179 183 184 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 488
Write 420
Mixed 317
SusWrite 190
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 39.3
136% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 192
166% 248 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
761GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 80.6
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.1
126% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback