Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 71.5 31% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 80.2 8-Core 76.5 11% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 79.4 5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1086) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.1 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 212 329 340 329 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 215 Write 274 Mixed 188 SusWrite 298 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 27.3 99% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 95.6 75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KDGR/8G 1x8GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 3.2 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	81x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	60x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	15x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	68x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	63x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	13x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	4x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	24x
ACR16D3LS1KDGR/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 25%, 123 samples	17x
AM1L16BC4R1-B1WS 1x4GBAdataBench 19%, 447 samples	14x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25