Acer Aspire ES1-732

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-732  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Seismo_AP
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 23:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 71.5
31% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 80.2
8-Core 76.5
11% 78.3 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Acer(1025 1086) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 212 329 340 329 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 215
Write 274
Mixed 188
SusWrite 298
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 27.3
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 95.6
75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KDGR/8G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 3.2
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-732 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-732

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback