Acer TravelMate P238-G2-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer TravelMate P238-G2-M  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL BA30
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171116
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 22:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 167
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 270
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1228) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 5.81
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.8
7% 8.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 394 336 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 419
Write 413
Mixed 354
SusWrite 261
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 37
115% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 307
224% 288 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KDGR/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P238-G2-M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P238-G2-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback