Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '21 at 00:04
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 539 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.6% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 49.7 45% 45 fps	MRender 60.3 Gravity 50 Splatting 50.3 43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,697 Write 384 Mixed 1,175 238% 1,085 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 43.8 131% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 894 DQ Write 603 DQ Mixed 726 548% 741 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Portable 2TB 11,289 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 128 129 128 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 89 Write 108 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 128 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4266 C16 2x8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 14.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	771x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	612x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	482x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	207x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	186x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	151x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	123x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $920

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16