Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 05:20
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 19.3
2-Core 42.9
23% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 39.8
8-Core 55
6% 47.4 Pts
64-Core 49.3
3% 49.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Zotac(19DA 7046) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.11.9713
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 41 21 40 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 11.2
Write 33
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 25.2
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 41%
ADATA HV620S 4TB
2TB free, PID a64a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 21 22 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 18
19% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.4
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M61PME-S2P Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback