Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 76.1
43% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 75.9
10% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 76.7
5% 76.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Nvidia(10DE 0719) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 12
Parallax 3.8
8% 8.67 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 8
Splatting 4.2
5% 6.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 83 79 92 98 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 36.4
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 81.5
32% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 4.4
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA69G-S3H Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $196
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback