Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 14:04
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 240
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 671
66% 538 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 26.4
13% 18.7 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 25
Splatting 22.7
16% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 159 32 39 27 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 433
Write 410
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 76.1
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 1.5
37% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 1.3
64% 147 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40
141GB free
Firmware: ZM100-38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 34 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 58.4
Write 11.7
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 53.6
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 34%
Maxtor 6Y120M0 123GB-$34
108GB free
Firmware: YAR511W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 50 49 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 46.9
Write 53.7
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 50.2
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 32%
ST925031 5AS 250GB
48GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 29.7
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 3.7
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 18%
Maxtor 6 Y160P0 164GB
10GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 32.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 29.3
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback