Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 22 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 13:14
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$157
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 123
61% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 264
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 64
Parallax 62
46% 60.8 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 57
Splatting 51.6
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 12 27 43 31 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 130
Write 102
Mixed 102
SusWrite 30.7
20% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 16.5
61% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 3.3
9% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
41GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 20 28 32 24 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 28.4
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
499GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 78 76 77 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 40.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 71
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 67%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
223GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 3.3
9% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 19%
Maxtor 6 Y160P0 164GB
27GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 25.8
35% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 22GB
null MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback