Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$106
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 141
52% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 490
41% 355 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 62 44 62 129 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 380
Write 294
Mixed 264
SusWrite 102
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 13.4
63% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 32.1
42% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 114 108 117 121 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 02.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 62 80 81 83 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 90.8
Write 77.7
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 75.3
51% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4W.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 26.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback