ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '15 at 05:43
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460S 10,941 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 91.4 2-Core 178 61% 135 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 324 45% 331 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3201) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 33.5 37% 38.9 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 36 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 15 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 15 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 443691461	110% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 407 Mixed 405 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 41.3 180% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 50.1 86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 908GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 2258 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 45 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 42 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 39 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 31 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	85.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 137 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.19 4K Write 2.67 4K Mixed 0.36 139% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 109%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 358GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 99.2 Write 87.5 Mixed 44.3 92% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.16 17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 44%
Inateck FE2005 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 47GB free, PID 2590 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	321% Outstanding	Read 316 Write 332 Mixed 289 402% 312 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 20.9 2,993% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.2 DQ Write 78.9 DQ Mixed 20.2 3,489% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 321% Great: 321%
OTG OTG 120GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 38GB free, PID 2012 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 138 Write 287 Mixed 162 272% 196 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 9.46 2,358% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 9.59 2,820% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 266%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	423x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	398x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	354x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	224x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $331

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $251	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback