Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '16 at 05:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 178
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 351
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 103
Parallax 92.9
80% 98 fps
MRender 86.2
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 79.3
69% 84.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 406
Mixed 413
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 25.8
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 47.4
61% 113 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 163
Mixed 150
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.27
123% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 109%
Inateck FE2005 480GB
348GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 327
Write 286
Mixed 148
305% 254 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 4.03
2,254% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 6.03
2,777% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 299%
Great: 303%
OTG OTG 120GB
39GB free, PID 2012
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 291
Mixed 126
254% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 9.82
2,372% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 10.1
2,850% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 266%
Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback