Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460S 10,941 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 134 57% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 186 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	9.25% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 12 Parallax 8.5 10% 10.7 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 10 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 10%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 853GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 155 Write 114 Mixed 63.5 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 2,097 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 23.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 7.4 13% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.6 27% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 6,196 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM