bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardELITEGROUP 945G-M3
Memory1.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060828
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '15 at 12:54
Run Duration730 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 14.6
2-Core 26.3
19% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 31.3
8-Core 27.8
4% 29.5 Pts
64-Core 33.3
2% 33.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(1048 0F52) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 1.31
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.74
3% 3.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN059 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Below average
Read 202
Write 147
Mixed 178
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 9.42
39% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 11.2
12% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 30%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 170
Mixed 158
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.32
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 114%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 1TB
920GB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 124
Write 127
Mixed 96.4
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.42
91% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
691GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 123
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 84%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 500GB
446GB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 86.1
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.38
87% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 500GB
198GB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41% Average
Read 112
Write 31.5
Mixed 49.1
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.13
44% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41%
Great: 60%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 103
152% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.21
56% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 74%
WDC WD20 PURX-64P6ZY0 2TB
695GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 102
Write 97.4
Mixed 90.5
123% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.27
75% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 56%
Inateck FE2005 128GB
113GB free, PID 2590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.3% Excellent
Read 170
Write 147
Mixed 158
201% 158 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 8.88
4K Mixed 7.58
580% 7.35 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 7.49
1,010% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 321%
ELECOM MF-MSU3 8GB
7GB free, PID 6015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 61.2
Write 5.15
Mixed 10.3
22% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.27
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.11
26% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback