Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '19 at 08:08
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 206 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 464 62% 464 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 45.3 Reflection 44.5 Parallax 39.6 37% 43.1 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 35.7 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 8.1 4.8 61 234 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 432 Write 354 Mixed 9 SusWrite 92.7 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 20.1 76% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 87.5 DQ Mixed 45.4 49% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 43GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 152 116 93 83 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 490 Write 434 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 124 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 31 145% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 131 123% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 210GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 192 191 193 193 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 491 Mixed 349 SusWrite 206 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 53.8 194% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 281 230% 330 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 106%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-60A7B2 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 266GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 38.7 Write 38.2 Mixed 33 SusWrite 36.8 50% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 42%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 106GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 39.8 Write 18 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 4.9 28% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 41 Write 41.7 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 0.4 39% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 430GB free, PID a108 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Read 35.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 5.3 14% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,073x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	933x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	297x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	232x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	301x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	158x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16