Acer Predator G5900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G5900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5900
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 85
2-Core 150
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 38.9
28% 34.5 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 34.8
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 75 60 78 86 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 88.5
Write 84.3
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 72.7
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
375GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 132
Write 122
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 98.5
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
280GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 52.3
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 62.2
42% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$60
278GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 17
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
188GB free, PID a108
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 19.5
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 15
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8313 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5900 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback