Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 04:34
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 150
2-Core 277
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 829
84% 678 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 198
Parallax 173
143% 182 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 174
Splatting 122
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 468 333 248 248 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 472
Mixed 386
SusWrite 331
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.6
149% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 325
247% 333 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 98%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
0GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 154
Mixed 206
57% 261 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 41.2
152% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 133
108% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4
46GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,357
Write 1,151
Mixed 852
248% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.1
179% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 646
521% 736 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 219%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
172GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 65
Write 67.2
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 50.5
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 48%
SABRENT 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 97 97 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 96.5
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 96.6
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 31 10 29 23 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 104
Write 99.3
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 35.3
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 67%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
730GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 60.3
Write 57.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 0.4
51% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
320GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 74.8
Write 68
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 8.5
66% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 32%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 63 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 191
Write 151
Mixed 81
SusWrite 65.7
151% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 74%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
164GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 64 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 53.2
Write 19.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 66.2
57% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 25.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 27.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 8 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $759
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback