Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 195 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 781 69% 587 Pts	64-Core 1,074 66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372D) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 24.1 Parallax 25.1 26% 27.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 31.6 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 52GB 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 478 Write 475 Mixed 397 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 43.6 142% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 205 147% 187 MB/s

Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 13GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 486 Mixed 397 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 56.2 188% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 357 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4TB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 128 132 134 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 101 Write 120 Mixed 73 SusWrite 130 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.7 4% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 203 205 203 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 165 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 201 121% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 95GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 83 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 60.8 Write 87 Mixed 68 SusWrite 85.5 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.5 159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 156GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 64 64 70 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 62.5 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 68.1 46% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 459GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 81 80 84 80 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 84.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 81.1 95% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 26GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 29 14 15 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 156 Write 44.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 26.6 72% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.6 121% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FA 2x8GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 28.5 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 24.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	419x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $712

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)