Average Bench: 50.3% (717th of 1276)

Based on 8,788 user benchmarks.  Devices: 178BFBFF00630F01, , 178BFBFF00630F81, 078BFBFF00630F01 Models: AMD A10-7700K APU with Radeon(TM) R7 Graphics, AMD A10-7700K Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Poor: 37%Average: 50.3% Great: 59%
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Average average bench

The AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) averaged 49.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 63.9Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 63.8Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) is 21.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 217Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 216Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 8,788 samples)
Min Avg Max
44.8 Memory 63.9 76.5
47.3 1-Core 63.8 73
88.3 2-Core 121 142
50.6% 83 Pts
Min Avg Max
130 4-Core 214 257
147 8-Core 216 259
29.4% 215 Pts
Min Avg Max
146 64-Core 217 259
14.6% 217 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.8
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 126
55% 88 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 222
32% 231 Pts
64-Core 237
16% 237 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 73.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 134
56% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 243
34% 244 Pts
64-Core 237
16% 237 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.2
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 130
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 249
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 236
16% 236 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 67.4
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 133
54% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 245
34% 247 Pts
64-Core 246
16% 246 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 55.6
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 148
54% 93 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 249
36% 257 Pts
64-Core 267
18% 267 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.9
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 104
49% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 166
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 176
12% 176 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 56.2
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 79.3
38% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 140
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 142
10% 142 Pts
8,788 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,627,113 CPUs tested.

Typical A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) Builds (Compare 976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $70

Popular A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

with 4gb graphic card its like ps4


Excellent

2 years ago.

Good for low-medium settings in games, but not great when video editing or multitasking.


Good

1 month ago.

eta rre cheto vro soi vofe jepe


Poor

19 months ago.

Good for a media/netflix pc not gaming/streaming.


Your
opinion?
1276 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback