Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 06:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 37.7
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 110
39% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 182
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 4.9
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 293 296 299 301 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 452
Write 275
Mixed 287
SusWrite 295
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 24.3
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 34.4
60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 54.9
Mixed 44
SusWrite 60.6
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback