Average Bench: 67.6% (457th of 1452)

Based on 16,233 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000106A5, Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz
Poor: 56%Average: 67.6% Great: 76%
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop 71%
Workstation 52%

Above average average bench

The Intel Core i7 960 averaged 32.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Memory Latency 87.2Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 79.5Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core i7 960 is 20.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core i7 960 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Multi Core Speed 373Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 370Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 16,233 samples)
Min Avg Max
77.2 Memory 87.2 96.4
61.8 1-Core 79.5 86.7
115 2-Core 152 168
64.3% 106 Pts
Min Avg Max
190 4-Core 264 325
250 8-Core 370 416
39.9% 317 Pts
Min Avg Max
244 64-Core 373 417
23.1% 373 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 88.3
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 402
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 94.4
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 159
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 382
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 86.3
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 406
46% 358 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 89.2
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 399
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 92.4
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 325
39% 300 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 90.3
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 148
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 404
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Memory 85.7
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 157
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 381
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 82
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 128
60% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 365
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 12.7
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 85.8
25% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 240
24% 196 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
16,233 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,074,799 CPUs tested


If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

AmazonUS $22019 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Core i7 960 Builds (Compare 1,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop 75%
Workstation 29%

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $500

Popular Core i7 960 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.



DescriptionIntel® Core™ i7-960 Processor (8M Cache, 3.20 GHz, 4.80 GT/s Intel® QPI)
Code NameBloomfield
Launch DateQ4'09
Processor Numberi7-960
# of Cores4
# of Threads8
Cache8 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsSSE4.2
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography45 nm
VID Voltage Range0.800V-1.375V
Recommended Price$305.00
Clock Speed3.2 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency3.46 GHz
Bus Speed4.8 GT/s QPI
QPI Links1
Max TDP130 W


Max Memory Size24 GB
Memory TypesDDR3 800/1066
Memory Channels3
Memory Bandwidth25.6 GB/s
Physical Address Extensions36-bit
ECC Memory SupportedNo

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsNo

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesNo
Turbo Boost Tech1.0
Hyper-Threading TechYes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
Demand Based SwitchingNo


Package Size42.5mm x 45.0mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCLGA1366
Processing Die Size263 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors731 million

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
Trusted Execution TechNo


Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

6 months ago.

dam it worked good for me, had it for three years or so


2 years ago.

Running since December of 2009 on an OCZ PSU (Branded but made by SeaSonic) as a simple office file server. outlasted countless RAIDS and mobos. Most likely will be decommissioned because of age and could easily game on for a bit.


16 months ago.


Still working fine after 13 years and able to manage current games with a correct graphic card. Quite logical has he got similar power to twelve year later processors like current low range in i3 or Ryzen 5. It his very reliable : it is always ready in a computer that never stopped working during this time with 3 appartement moves and several changes in the PC (RAM, PCI Cards, drives etc..).—Feb '23


2 years ago.

been using it since 2010. played skyrim since launch with it and everything else after


3 years ago.

i have one with ocz ram (4gb x 3) and it works fine with 1gb gpu


5 years ago.

9xx series i7 were a powerhouse when they came out and still do good work. Their power usage is out of control though


10 months ago.

first computer


2 years ago.

served me well @4ghz for years


6 years ago.

still chugging along

1452 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback