Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Memory 17.1 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 50.4 20% 35 Pts	4-Core 53.6 8-Core 31 6% 42.3 Pts	64-Core 27.1 2% 27.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39F5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
EYOTA-128GB 128GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R3G42 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 138 228 242 197 101 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 263 Write 281 Mixed 258 SusWrite 192 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 15.4 55% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 91.7 DQ Write 98.5 DQ Mixed 106 77% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 385GB free Firmware: AM0Q6E SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 83 102 100 103 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 109 Mixed 33.4 SusWrite 93.1 59% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 4.2 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 343 12% 343 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 28%, 3,903 samples	5x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	5x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	5x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	5x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	5x
RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 1x4GBRamaxelBench 26%, 4,120 samples	2x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16