TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel FH8068003067417

Celeron N4000

▲ 51806 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads @1.10 GHz, Gemini Lake.
Release date ≈ Q2 2018.

Average Bench: 23.8% (1420th of 1459)

Based on 14,024 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000706A1 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4000 CPU @ 1.10GHz
Poor: 12%Average: 23.8% Great: 33%
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N4000 averaged 76.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 34.1Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 45.3Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N4000 is 20.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N4000 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 79.2Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 80.6Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 14,024 samples)
Rank 142023.8%
Min Avg Max
12.9 Memory 34.1 47
17.4 1-Core 45.3 58.3
30.1 2-Core 75.5 112
30.2% 51.6 Pts
Min Avg Max
34.8 4-Core 78.9 113
35.8 8-Core 80.6 113
10.6% 79.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
34.4 64-Core 79.2 112
4.9% 79.2 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
31.6% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 96.8
39% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
27.5% Poor
Memory 38
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 98.6
35% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 99.8
8-Core 95.1
13% 97.4 Pts
64-Core 96.3
6% 96.3 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
24.3% Poor
Memory 36.8
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 69.4
30% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 69.7
8-Core 70.6
9% 70.1 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
21.9% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 103
34% 62 Pts
4-Core 94.8
8-Core 58.1
11% 76.4 Pts
64-Core 61.5
4% 61.5 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
21.7% Poor
Memory 35.2
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 60.5
27% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 45.9
8-Core 64
7% 55 Pts
64-Core 64.8
4% 64.8 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
21.5% Poor
Memory 31.1
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 66.6
25% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 71.9
8-Core 61
9% 66.4 Pts
64-Core 61.7
4% 61.7 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
16.6% Very poor
Memory 19
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 77.2
26% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 79.6
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 76.4
5% 76.4 Pts
14,024 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,302,771 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Celeron N4000 Builds (Compare 876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples266x
GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples360x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples258x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples114x
SSD
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 66%, 7,685 samples101x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples59x
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBSsstcBench 63%, 1,207 samples39x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples199x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 4,752 samples56x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 12,631 samples34x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Celeron N4000 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N4000 (4M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz)
Code NameGemini Lake
Launch DateQ4'17
Processor NumberN4000
# of Cores2
# of Threads2
Burst Frequency2.60 GHz
Cache4 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4.8 W
Thermal Solution Specification105 deg C
Product BriefLink

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics 600
Graphics Base Frequency200 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency650 MHz
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Turbo Boost 3.0 TechNo
Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Smart Response TechNo
Speed Shift TechnologyNo

Package

Package Size25mm x 24mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1090

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,828

Excellent

2 years ago.

It is good for a game I play looking at videos

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,793

Poor

2 years ago.

Cheap, cheaper - N4000 If the SOC is able to hold the 2,5ghz turbo (no throttling - good cooling), surfing and office tasks works fine. Try to remove power limits for greater gaming experience...

POL-User
Avatar level
4,616

Terrible

15 months ago.

nie warte kradziezy czy nawet oddania ukrainie

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,998

Terrible

2 years ago.

It's ok for surfing the web but for anything else, it's a lost cause.

ESP-User
Avatar level
3,765

Terrible

18 months ago.

good performance, no noise, efficient. integrated graphics drives hd 1920x1080 display with no problem. runs windows 10 with no problems, edge browser w/ 10+ tabs no speed decrease notable, only 6w tdp - get 10 hour battery life.

LKA-User
Avatar level
1,934

Excellent

2 years ago.

This prossesor good for normal using like microsoft office but not good for gaming amd programing

SAU-User
Avatar level
1,926

Terrible

4 months ago.

it is really bad actually it is the worst processor i have ever seen in my live

Thibs
Avatar level
188

Terrible

4 years ago.

Bad performance.

TheWildShadow55
Avatar level
116

Average

5 years ago.

It might perform kinda bad, but for something that is so low power it's sorta sorta nice. That's the only good thing about it though

jetface5000
Avatar level
16

Poor

20 months ago.

Low core count, not fast. Good enough for web browsing and watching videos, and that's about it. It struggles to run games that require more than a potato to run.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback