Average Bench: 25.9% (799th of 1206)

Based on 3,794 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000706A1 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4000 CPU @ 1.10GHz

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N4000 averaged 74.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 53.6Pts
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed 98.9Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N4000 is just 15.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N4000 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 101Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 102Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,794 samples)
Min Avg Max
26 1-Core 53.6 62
47.1 2-Core 98.9 119
36.3% 76.3 Pts
Min Avg Max
53 4-Core 100 119
58.1 8-Core 102 119
13.8% 101 Pts
Min Avg Max
54.7 64-Core 101 118
6.8% 101 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 114
42% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 118
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 119
8% 119 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 120
42% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 119
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 118
8% 118 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 114
41% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 114
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 113
8% 113 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 93
37% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 83.1
14% 95.5 Pts
64-Core 95.7
6% 95.7 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 97.6
37% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 102
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 99.9
7% 99.9 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 49.3
26% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 102
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 49.1
19% 39.4 Pts
4-Core 55.1
8-Core 58
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 41.9
3% 41.9 Pts
3,794 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 24,105,157 CPUs tested.

Typical Celeron N4000 Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Celeron N4000 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N4000 (4M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz)
Code NameGemini Lake
Launch DateQ4'17
Processor NumberN4000
# of Cores2
# of Threads2
Burst Frequency2.60 GHz
Cache4 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4.8 W
Thermal Solution Specification105 deg C
Product BriefLink

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics 600
Graphics Base Frequency200 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency650 MHz
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Turbo Boost 3.0 TechNo
Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Smart Response TechNo
Speed Shift TechnologyNo

Package

Package Size25mm x 24mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1090

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Use in Samsung Chromebook 4, faster than Intel N3060 in Samsung Chromebook 3. Worth the upgrade.


Poor

1 month ago.

Cheap, cheaper - N4000 If the SOC is able to hold the 2,5ghz turbo (no throttling - good cooling), surfing and office tasks works fine. Try to remove power limits for greater gaming experience...


Terrible

27 days ago.

Brilliant performance on my Vivobook compared to the N3060 on my Dell Inspiron


Terrible

1 month ago.

good performance, no noise, efficient. integrated graphics drives hd 1920x1080 display with no problem. runs windows 10 with no problems, edge browser w/ 10+ tabs no speed decrease notable, only 6w tdp - get 10 hour battery life.


Poor

5 months ago.

Muy bueno, le aumente memoria y SSD y va.. excelente!! a un precio demaciado barato!!!, no se calienta y anda super bien


Good

8 days ago.

This prossesor good for normal using like microsoft office but not good for gaming amd programing


Average

12 months ago.

It might perform kinda bad, but for something that is so low power it's sorta sorta nice. That's the only good thing about it though


Your
opinion?
1206 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback