Average Bench: 27.6% (1300th of 1358)

Based on 15,548 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000706A1 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4000 CPU @ 1.10GHz
Poor: 15%Average: 27.6% Great: 34%
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N4000 averaged 72.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 53.7Pts
Avg. Memory Latency 37.9Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N4000 is just 18.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N4000 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 100Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 103Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 15,548 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.7 Memory 37.9 47.5
23.1 1-Core 53.7 63.6
38.9 2-Core 99.1 122
36.9% 63.6 Pts
Min Avg Max
47.5 4-Core 101 122
49.4 8-Core 103 123
13.9% 102 Pts
Min Avg Max
40.6 64-Core 100 122
6.7% 100 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 48.1
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 122
44% 76 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 117
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 117
8% 117 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.6
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 118
44% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 122
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 112
8% 112 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Memory 40
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 115
32% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 117
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 39.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 114
42% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 88.9
15% 105 Pts
64-Core 92.9
6% 92.9 Pts
15,548 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 54,507,917 CPUs tested.

Typical Celeron N4000 Builds (Compare 866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $22

Popular Celeron N4000 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N4000 (4M Cache, up to 2.60 GHz)
Code NameGemini Lake
Launch DateQ4'17
Processor NumberN4000
# of Cores2
# of Threads2
Burst Frequency2.60 GHz
Cache4 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4.8 W
Thermal Solution Specification105 deg C
Product BriefLink

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics 600
Graphics Base Frequency200 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
# of Displays Supported3
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency650 MHz
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Turbo Boost 3.0 TechNo
Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Smart Response TechNo
Speed Shift TechnologyNo

Package

Package Size25mm x 24mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1090

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

6 months ago.

It is good for a game I play looking at videos


Poor

25 days ago.

Cheap, cheaper - N4000 If the SOC is able to hold the 2,5ghz turbo (no throttling - good cooling), surfing and office tasks works fine. Try to remove power limits for greater gaming experience...


Terrible

3 months ago.

It's ok processor, nothing much.


Good

22 days ago.

Not bad. Runs minecraft pretty well


Terrible

6 months ago.

Remember the Pentium 4? It's kind of like that but dual core with no hyperthreading. In 2021.


Terrible

10 months ago.

It's ok for surfing the web but for anything else, it's a lost cause.


Excellent

12 months ago.

good performance, no noise, efficient. integrated graphics drives hd 1920x1080 display with no problem. runs windows 10 with no problems, edge browser w/ 10+ tabs no speed decrease notable, only 6w tdp - get 10 hour battery life.


Poor

6 months ago.

I used this CPU for 2 years, It's terrible in EVERYTHING and I do not recommend it. The only good thing about it is that its low power. That's it. It can't even handle 2 chrome tabs at once.


Excellent

3 months ago.

This prossesor good for normal using like microsoft office but not good for gaming amd programing


Terrible

2 years ago.

Bad performance.


Average

3 years ago.

It might perform kinda bad, but for something that is so low power it's sorta sorta nice. That's the only good thing about it though


Your
opinion?
1358 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $275Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $470Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $535Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $449SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback