Acer Aspire A315-34

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-34  (all builds)
MotherboardGLK Rose_GL
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210624
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 04:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Memory 17.5
1-Core 35
2-Core 30.4
17% 27.6 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 37.1
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Acer(1025 1360) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 1
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 133 101 114 128 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 341
Write 298
Mixed 332
SusWrite 126
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 6.9
28% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 59.5
45% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 155%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.13% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-34 Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-34

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback