Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

E1-1200 APU

▲ 5074 ▼

2 Cores, 2 Threads.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

Average Bench: 23.2% (1432nd of 1468)

Based on 6,904 user benchmarks.  Devices: 00500F20178BFBFF, 178BFBFF00500F20 Model: AMD E1-1200 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
Poor: 10%Average: 23.2% Great: 39%
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Popular builds with this CPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD E1-1200 APU averaged 76.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 42.3Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 13.7Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD E1-1200 APU is 28.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E1-1200 APU performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 26.2Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 26.9Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 6,904 samples)
Rank 143223.2%
Min Avg Max
16.3 Memory 42.3 74.1
5.6 1-Core 13.7 17.2
8.95 2-Core 25.1 33.8
20% 27 Pts
Min Avg Max
12.5 4-Core 26.1 33.5
13.2 8-Core 26.9 33.7
3.5% 26.5 Pts
Min Avg Max
10.1 64-Core 26.2 33.5
1.6% 26.2 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
22.2% Poor
Memory 40.5
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 24.2
19% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 25
8-Core 23.9
3% 24.5 Pts
64-Core 24.2
2% 24.2 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
20.1% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 21.4
18% 24 Pts
4-Core 22.3
8-Core 22.4
3% 22.3 Pts
64-Core 22.8
1% 22.8 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
18.7% Very poor
Memory 33.4
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 25.1
17% 24.1 Pts
4-Core 25.6
8-Core 23.7
3% 24.7 Pts
64-Core 24.6
2% 24.6 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 31
1-Core 13.5
2-Core 19.8
16% 21.4 Pts
4-Core 21.7
8-Core 22.7
3% 22.2 Pts
64-Core 18.4
1% 18.4 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
16.1% Very poor
Memory 31.3
1-Core 2.8
2-Core 3.9
12% 12.7 Pts
4-Core 6.6
8-Core 8.2
1% 7.4 Pts
64-Core 5.5
0% 5.5 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
14.6% Very poor
Memory 28.2
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 7.3
13% 15.8 Pts
4-Core 7.3
8-Core 11.2
1% 9.25 Pts
64-Core 18.6
1% 18.6 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
14.4% Very poor
Memory 25.8
1-Core 5.9
2-Core 8.8
11% 13.5 Pts
4-Core 18.3
8-Core 21.1
2% 19.7 Pts
64-Core 26.2
2% 26.2 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
8.88% Terrible
Memory 15
1-Core 10.4
2-Core 11.1
9% 12.2 Pts
4-Core 16.1
8-Core 18.6
2% 17.4 Pts
64-Core 19.9
1% 19.9 Pts
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
2.78% Terrible
Memory 3.53
1-Core 1.7
2-Core 8.2
2% 4.48 Pts
4-Core 11.7
8-Core 12.5
2% 12.1 Pts
64-Core 14.1
1% 14.1 Pts
6,904 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,052,604 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical E1-1200 APU Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples36x
GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples47x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples45x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples37x
SSD
A400 480GBKingston  $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples9x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples6x
BX500 120GBCrucial  $49Bench 55%, 37,154 samples5x
RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 1x4GBAdataBench 24%, 2,118 samples19x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples10x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35

Popular E1-1200 APU systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,048

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

24 months ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,908

Terrible

2 years ago.

No better than a 15 years old Pentium 4!

CAN-User
Avatar level
5,080

Poor

10 months ago.

Userbenchmark program installs but will not run on the PC

FIN-User
Avatar level
2,598

Terrible

3 years ago.

bad CPU, can barely handle typing text

iiEpicGamerYT
Avatar level
8

Terrible

4 years ago.

This CPU is clocked at 1.40 GHz with no turbo, it has a terrible iGPU, TERRIBLE CPU.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 10 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i5-13400F

1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback