Today's hottest deals

Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355E5C-A02TR
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 8.5
2-Core 22.4
29% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 27.5
8-Core 28.4
4% 28 Pts
64-Core 28.9
2% 28.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 51 61 36 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 49.6
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 48.5
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
3GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.3 10 11 11 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Read 7.1
Write 10.4
Mixed 6.9
SusWrite 9.7
12% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
800, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 1.4
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback