Intel
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
  

4 Cores, 8 Threads.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 6,023 user samples
384 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 283rd / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 591st / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
77.2 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
59.9 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
86.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
106 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+66%
63.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
207 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+75%
118 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
370 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+79%
207 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
554 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+67%
332 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.9 Pts +4% 91.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
117 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+54%
75.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
231 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+63%
142 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
429 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+71%
251 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
588 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+38%
425 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,072,259 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 52 % +2%
Age
Newest
123+ Months 117 Months +5%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
590 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+38%
426 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
559 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+66%
336 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback