Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150108
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '22 at 08:36
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 384 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 183 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 496 50% 407 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W5000 817 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 0B06) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.23.01 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 20.6 14% 21.5 fps	MRender 21.4 Gravity 15.1 Splatting 19.5 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 17%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 460 Write 441 Mixed 378 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 42.1 139% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 346 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 77GB free Firmware: A31B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 70.3 Write 78.4 Mixed 38.3 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 158GB free Firmware: A3EA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 129 Write 133 Mixed 60.6 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 29.8 Write 3.7 Mixed 5.7 12% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 4x8GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 16.1 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W530 Power Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power

CPU
Xeon E3-1246 v3Intel $200Bench 73%, 2,511 samples	17x
Xeon E3-1276 v3Intel $300Bench 77%, 297 samples	16x
Xeon E3-1245 v3Intel $245Bench 71%, 2,834 samples	16x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	8x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	6x
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 56%, 297 samples	9x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 528 samples	7x
HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 57%, 188 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16