COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80677G4560
IntelBX8070110600K
▲ 6716,259 ▼

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.5GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 899,474 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.1GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

Effective Speed 
+61%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 141,005 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
70,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 656th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
70,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 145th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		57.3 % 92.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+61%
Average Score 
+101%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		75.4 Pts 90.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		90.6 Pts 137 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+51%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		159 Pts 268 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+69%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		227 Pts 505 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+122%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		239 Pts 825 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+245%
Overclocked Score 
+89%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.4 Pts 96.6 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		104 Pts 149 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+43%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		187 Pts 296 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+58%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		275 Pts 569 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+107%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		279 Pts 918 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+229%
Value & Sentiment 
+8%
Market Share
Based on 69,007,571 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.15 % 0.25 % Much higher market share.
+67%
Value
Value For Money 		105 % 113 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		67 % 89 % Much more popular.
+33%
Price
Price (score) 		$31 Much cheaper.
+77% 		$134
Nice To Haves 
+121%
Age
Newest 		94 Months 54 Months Much more recent.
+43%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		54 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+57% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		2 cores 6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 4.1 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 4.8 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+37%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		278 Pts 1,154 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+315%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		241 Pts 1,041 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+332%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 610 UHD 630
Launch Date
Launch Date 		Q1'17 Q2'20
Cache
Cache 		3 MB 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions 		SSE4.1/4.2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Bus Speed
Bus Speed 		8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification 		PCG 2015C (65W) PCG 2015D
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) 		64 GB 128 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types 		DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V DDR4-2666
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡ 		Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡ 		Intel® HD Graphics 610 Intel® UHD Graphics 630
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency 		350.00 MHz 350 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency 		1.05 GHz 1.20 GHz
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) 		No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision 		3.0 3

More specs » More specs »
Conclusion 
Average Bench 57.3%
Average Bench 92.2%

The Intel G4560 is one of the first Pentium processors to feature Hyper-threading. This means that although the G4560 only has two physical processing cores, it is able to process four threads in parallel by sharing resources between the physical cores. This typically results in a 50% performance improvement over two physical cores alone. Comparing performance between the lowest spec Kaby Lake i3 7100 and the Pentium G4560 shows that in terms of both performance and specs, very little separates them (even virtualization technology VT-d is present on the Pentium). The Pentium does lack AVX 2.0 (Advanced Vector Instructions) and it trails the i3 7100 by 400 MHz (10%) but there is no longer a clear divide between Pentiums and Core i3s. Intel have achieved an almost continuous distribution of performance levels for each price point from the cheapest Pentium to the top end i7-7700K. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
70,054
70,951
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback