Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$135
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 301
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 916
92% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5142 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 238
Parallax 277
232% 266 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 222
Splatting 161
184% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,846
Write 981
Mixed 450
238% 1,092 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 56.4
205% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 650
603% 936 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
441GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 38 144 274 270 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 415
Write 386
Mixed 309
SusWrite 203
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 17.6
76% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 44.3
49% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
510GB free
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 1590 1601 1605 1603 1597 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,653
Write 1,623
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 1,599
343% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 83.4
278% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 304
403% 726 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 292%
Great: 295%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
510GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 149 148 149 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 148
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 33.4
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 50.6
SC Mixed 17.6
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback