Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80646G3220
Intel

2 Cores, 2 Threads @3.0GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2013.

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≤ Q4 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,174 user samples
19,337 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 865th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
24,837 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 517th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
48.3 % 65.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
73.1 Pts 81.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
74.4 Pts 82.1 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 161 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+21%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
138 Pts 283 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+105%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
141 Pts 292 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+107%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.1 Pts 91.6 Pts +2%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
85.4 Pts 90.9 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+6%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
170 Pts 178 Pts +5%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
169 Pts 341 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+102%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
169 Pts 340 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+101%
Market Share
Based on 68,546,980 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.03 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
Value
Value For Money
92.3 % Better value.
+13%
81.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % +4% 52 %
Price
Price (score)
$26 Much cheaper.
+79%
$124
Age
Newest
132 Months 128+ Months +3%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
169 Pts 340 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+101%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
140 Pts 295 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+111%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q2'13
Cache
Cache
3 MB SmartCache 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$54.00 - $64.00 $182.00 - $187.00
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2013C PCG 2013D
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported
ECC Memory Supported ‡
Yes No
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA
Clear Video HD Tech
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
No Yes
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
1.7 GB 2 GB
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
No 2.0
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
No Yes

More specs » More specs »

The G3220 is a 2013 Haswell based CPU and is part of Intel's value range of Pentium processors which were launched in 2011. The Pentium-G range have very strong single and dual core performance but lag far behind the group leaders in terms of multi-core processing (MCP). MCP is important for tasks such as audio/video encoding, or software development. For regular PC use such as surfing the web, listening to music, watching movies and playing the vast majority of games, MCP is not required. The G3220 currently retails for one sixth of the price of a top of the range 4770K but has an effective speed of 75.3 which is just 12% lower than the average of the current group leaders. The vast majority of users will notice no difference even by paying five times more for one of the top end multi-core processors. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

just too old [Mar '22 marcelde]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $300WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $255Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback