Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 21:50
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 41
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 128
47% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 134
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 198E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.2
1% 2.23 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 378 422 393 397 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 336
Write 304
Mixed 233
SusWrite 372
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 20.7
78% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 228
184% 262 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback