COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8070811900K
AMD100-100000071BOX
▲ 753,225 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.5GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

VS
▲ 8910,195 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Game EFps  
+12%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		306 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+31% 		233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		109 EFps +4% 105 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		146 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+12% 		130 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		147 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+19% 		124 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		136 EFps 141 EFps +4%
Effective Speed 
+20%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 679,738 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
44,319 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 94% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 94% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
635,419 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 191st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		103 % Faster effective speed.
+20% 		85.9 %
External Data: 1080p 
+11%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best... 		11 % Forza5 4%, AoE4 20%, Bord3 18%, FarC6 16%, WatchDL 10%, BFV 18%, CPunk 4%, EldenR 8%, RDR2 6%, Civ6 21%, CSGO 12%, DoomE 1%
Average Score 
+22%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		87.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15% 		76.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		171 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+24% 		138 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		333 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23% 		270 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		638 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+24% 		513 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1114 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+24% 		900 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+23%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.6 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10% 		86.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		183 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+26% 		145 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		360 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+25% 		288 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		700 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+25% 		562 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1279 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+27% 		1009 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+28%
Market Share
Based on 68,910,427 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.44 % 0.69 % Much higher market share.
+57%
Value
Value For Money 		105 % +4% 101 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		75 % 89 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score) 		$265 $154 Much cheaper.
+42%
Nice To Haves 
+2%
Age
Newest 		43 Months Much more recent.
+32% 		63 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 3.6 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+20% 		4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1734 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+17% 		1479 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1600 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+18% 		1358 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Rocket Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		UHD 750 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 103%
Average Bench 85.9%

The i9-11900K is the fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
44,319
635,419
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback