IntelFJ8068404064405
IntelCW8064701470702
  

4 Cores, 8 Threads @1.80 GHz, Whiskey Lake.
Release date ≈ Q3 2018.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.4GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 150,810 user samples
81,207 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 29% Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 29% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 693rd / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
69,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 32% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 32% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 609th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
54.7 % 58.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
66.3 Pts 72.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
86.6 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+13%
76.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
152 Pts +5% 145 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
239 Pts 243 Pts +2%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
320 Pts 349 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+9%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
85.1 Pts 88 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
124 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+34%
92.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
229 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+27%
181 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
362 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+15%
314 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
488 Pts +4% 470 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,983,412 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % Hugely higher market share.
+250%
0.04 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % +2% 55 %
Age
Newest
68+ Months Much more recent.
+50%
135 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
480 Pts +2% 470 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
323 Pts 357 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+11%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'18 Q2'13
Cache
Cache
8 MB SmartCache 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$409.00 $378.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
4.60 GHz 3.4 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
4 GT/s OPI 5 GT/s DMI2
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 DDR3L 1333/1600
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
37.5 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® UHD Graphics 620 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
300 MHz 400 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
32 GB 2 GB
Package Size
Package Size
46x24 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3.0 3
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

Better than 8550u [Oct '19 lumiaveled]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-4700MQ is a high end mobile Haswell (2013) CPU. Despite sporting base and turbo clock speeds of 2.4/3.4 GHz, the 4700MQ has a maximum TDP of just 47 Watts. Although the 4700MQ is a quad core processor, hyperthreading technology allows the operation of eight virtual cores which enable the 4700MQ to deal with multi-core workloads with ease. The overall effective speed rating for the 4700MQ is 85.5 which is just 12% slower than the average of the current 9 group leaders. Since the group leaders include both desktop and server models this is a particularly impressive score for mobile processor with a TDP of just 47 Watts - it's almost as good as a reasonable desktop. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback