IntelBX80648I75930K
IntelCW8064701470702

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.4GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 103,642 user samples
34,039 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 70% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 249th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
69,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 32% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 32% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 613th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
79.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
58.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
87.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
72.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+34%
76.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
205 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+41%
145 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
391 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+61%
243 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
642 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+84%
349 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
88 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
126 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+36%
92.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
248 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+37%
181 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
483 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+54%
314 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
780 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+66%
470 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,141,200 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+100%
Value
Value For Money
95.8 % Much better value.
+51%
63.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % Slightly more popular.
+5%
55 %
Price
Price (score)
$143 Much cheaper.
+32%
$209
Age
Newest
118 Months More recent.
+13%
135 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
140 Watts 47 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+66%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
22 nm 22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+46%
2.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
3.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
983 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+109%
470 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
814 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+128%
357 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Haswell-E Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket
LGA2011-V3 FCPGA946
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None HD 4600
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'14 Q2'13
Cache
Cache
15 MB SmartCache 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.2, AVX 2.0, AES SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$583.00 - $594.00 $378.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz 3.4 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
0 GT/s 5 GT/s DMI2
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
64 GB 32 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4 1333/1600/2133 DDR3L 1333/1600
Memory Channels
Max # of Memory Channels
4 2
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
68 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
None Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Package Size
Package Size
52.5mm x 45.0mm 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.6mm
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3.0 3
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
40 16

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel 5930K is Intel's new middle tier Haswell-E prosumer CPU. This model has base/turbo clocks of 3.5/3.7 GHz and sports 6 physical cores with 12 hyperthreads. The 5930K offers enormous processing throughput but like its Haswell-E siblings it lacks in single and dual-core speed. Comparing the 5930K and 4790K shows that the 4790K offers nearly 20% more single and dual core throughput and is priced nearly 40% lower than the 5930K. The 5930K does win hands down on multi-core workloads but these are not generally relevant to consumers. Finally since the Haswell-E architecture is coupled with the X99 chipset it requires far more expensive DDR4 RAM with offers little upside over DDR3. [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-4700MQ is a high end mobile Haswell (2013) CPU. Despite sporting base and turbo clock speeds of 2.4/3.4 GHz, the 4700MQ has a maximum TDP of just 47 Watts. Although the 4700MQ is a quad core processor, hyperthreading technology allows the operation of eight virtual cores which enable the 4700MQ to deal with multi-core workloads with ease. The overall effective speed rating for the 4700MQ is 85.5 which is just 12% slower than the average of the current 9 group leaders. Since the group leaders include both desktop and server models this is a particularly impressive score for mobile processor with a TDP of just 47 Watts - it's almost as good as a reasonable desktop. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback