Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80648I75820K
Intel

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.5 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 102,323 user samples
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 301st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
629 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 58% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 58% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 415th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
76.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
70.3 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
86.4 Pts +3% 84 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
96.3 Pts 96.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
192 Pts +5% 183 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
364 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+18%
308 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
594 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+31%
452 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94 Pts 94.7 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
120 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+9%
110 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
237 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+12%
212 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
462 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+28%
362 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
737 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+49%
493 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,014,614 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.13 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
94.7 % Much better value.
+47%
64.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % More popular.
+29%
51 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 Much cheaper.
+66%
$380
Age
Newest
123 Months +5% 129+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
933 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+89%
494 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
748 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+63%
458 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'14 Q2'13
Cache
Cache
15 MB SmartCache 8 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.2, AVX 2.0, AES SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$389.00 - $396.00 $303.00
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
0 GT/s 5 GT/s DMI2
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
64 GB 32 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4 1333/1600/2133 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V
Memory Channels
Max # of Memory Channels
4 2
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
68 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
None Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Package Size
Package Size
52.5mm x 45.0mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
vPro Tech
Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡
No Yes
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3.0 Up to 3.0
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
28 16

More specs » More specs »

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback