IntelBX80648I75820K
AMD100-100000010WOF

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

24 Cores, 48 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 108,303 user samples
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 289th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
6,609 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 164th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
76.8 % 87.2 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
86.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+21%
71.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
96.3 Pts 143 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+48%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
192 Pts 284 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+48%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
364 Pts 551 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+51%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
594 Pts 1092 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+84%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
94 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+15%
81.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
120 Pts 152 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
237 Pts 303 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+28%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
462 Pts 590 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+28%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
737 Pts 1173 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+59%
Market Share
Based on 68,072,803 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.12 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
94.7 % Much better value.
+68%
56.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % More popular.
+25%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 Hugely cheaper.
+90%
$1,350
Age
Newest
118 Months 54+ Months Much more recent.
+54%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
933 Pts 4616 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+395%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
748 Pts 4251 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+468%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

"Build to perform. Designed to win". Launched 25 November of 2019, this mighty 24 core 48 thread CPU boasts 88 PCIe 4.0 lanes (16 lanes used for high-speed interconnect, 176 PCIe 3.0 lanes effective), 142.25MB of cache, 3.8GHz base and 4.5GHz max boost clock with 280W effective TDP. This CPU competes well with entire of Intel HEDT and Xeon lineup thanks to unprecedented single core performance and insane multi core performance compared to all Intel HEDT CPUs. The new Threadripper 3000 series CPU is (in my opinion) classified as the Extreme High End Desktop (EHEDT) CPU as this CPU has both very high single core and multi core performance, high amount of PCIe lanes and L3 cache and clearly very high price (this CPU costs $1399.99 at launch) which ranks them above HEDT. [Nov '19 ColdSpy]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback