IntelBX80684I59600KF
IntelBX80648I75820K

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.70 GHz, 95 W.
Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 166,816 user samples
65,122 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 102% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 102%
SPEED RANK: 129th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 289th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
93.2 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
76.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
91.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
86.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
134 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+39%
96.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
267 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+39%
192 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
521 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+43%
364 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
686 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+15%
594 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.4 Pts +3% 94 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
151 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+26%
120 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
303 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+28%
237 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
597 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+29%
462 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
808 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+10%
737 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,074,519 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.23 % Hugely higher market share.
+130%
0.1 %
Value
Value For Money
105 % Better value.
+11%
94.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % More popular.
+24%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$180 $130 Cheaper.
+28%
Age
Newest
62+ Months Much more recent.
+47%
118 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
838 Pts 933 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
712 Pts 748 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+5%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q1'19 Q3'14
Cache
Cache
9 MB SmartCache 15 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.2, AVX 2.0, AES
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
4.60 GHz 3.6 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
8 GT/s DMI3 0 GT/s
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
128 GB 64 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-2666 DDR4 1333/1600/2133
Memory Channels
Max # of Memory Channels
2 4
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s 68 GB/s
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 52.5mm x 45.0mm
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
16 28

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

My favorite CPU of all time after the Core i3-8100 that I upgraded it from, to this, the amazing Core i5-9600KF, that has no problem being soft overclocked to 4.8 GHz on all cores with no stability or heat issues. I just love it and I have been using and don't plan on upgrading it anytime soon. What a beast! [Jun '23 therealmustii]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback