IntelBX80684I59400F
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @2.9GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q1 2019.

VS
About

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,991 user samples
50,649 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
24,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 490th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
82.4 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+98%
41.6 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
120 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+86%
64.5 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
238 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+93%
123 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
465 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+109%
223 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
661 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+77%
374 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
125 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+66%
75.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
248 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+71%
145 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
489 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+80%
271 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
711 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+50%
475 Pts
Market Share
Based on 23,839,268 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.28 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,500%
0.08 %
Value
Value For Money
97.6 % Hugely better value.
+89%
51.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
183 % Hugely more popular.
+200%
61 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 $127 Cheaper.
+15%
Age
Newest
11 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
64 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 8 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 3.2 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+10%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz +2% 4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
713 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+47%
486 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
670 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+77%
379 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2.9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from an AMD RX 570 to an RX 580. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback