IntelBX80677I57600K
AMDYD192XA8AEWOF

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
About

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 128,139 user samples
124,193 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
3,946 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
82.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
76.9 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
126 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+12%
112 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
248 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+13%
220 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
459 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
433 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
469 Pts 812 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+73%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
147 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+22%
120 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
292 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
237 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
568 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+20%
472 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
568 Pts 943 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+66%
Market Share
Based on 22,610,001 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % Hugely higher market share.
+960%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
84.8 % Slightly better value.
+7%
79.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
114 % Much more popular.
+34%
85 %
Price
Price (score)
$251 $249 +1%
Age
Newest
35 Months 28 Months More recent.
+20%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
91 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+49%
180 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+500%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz +5% 4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
565 Pts 2000 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+254%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
472 Pts 1793 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+280%
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture
Kaby Lake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 TR4
Series
CPU Architecture
Kaby Lake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 TR4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 630 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics[Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a 12 core 24 thread CPU, currently second only to the 1950X (16 cores, 32 threads) in AMD’s latest Zen-based line for high end desktop processors. Similarly to the 1950X, it has a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz (3.4 GHz for the 1950X) which can boost to a maximum of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. Also, like the other Threadripper CPUs, the 1920X sits on the latest X399 platform. Intel has a number of processors which outperform the 1920X, such as the i5-7600K which is a quarter of the price and offers around 25% better performance than the 1920X for single and quad core usage (most games only use a maximum of four cores). However, the 1920X is squarely aimed at offering value for money to multi-core workstation users and in this category, the 1920X is closer to competing with Intel’s 15% dearer 10 core, 20 thread i9-7900X. The 8 core, 16 thread 1900X, will shortly be available as the third product in the Threadripper line, featuring a slightly higher base clock of 3.8 GHz. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback