COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80677I57600K
AMDYD192XA8AEWOF
$800
▲ 7418,202 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 59473 ▼
 $800 

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Effective Speed 
+2%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 205,446 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
195,006 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 318th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
10,440 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 291st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		75.8 % 77.6 % +2%
External Data: 1080p 
+17%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki... 		17 % GTAV 17%
Average Score 
+20%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+21% 		70.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		120 Pts +3% 117 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts +3% 231 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		379 Pts 453 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+20%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		403 Pts 836 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+107%
Overclocked Score 
+10%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.8 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12% 		85.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		144 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+13% 		127 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		286 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+14% 		251 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		490 Pts 498 Pts +2%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		504 Pts 955 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+89%
Value & Sentiment 
+919%
Market Share
Based on 68,935,891 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.36 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,500% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		95.4 % Much better value.
+64% 		58 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		74 % More popular.
+25% 		59 %
Price
Price (score) 		$120 Hugely cheaper.
+85% 		$800
Nice To Haves 
+138%
Age
Newest 		94 Months 86 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		91 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+49% 		180 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+500%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9% 		3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz +5% 4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		510 Pts 1923 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+277%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		407 Pts 1713 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+321%
Specifications 
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 TR4
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 TR4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 75.8%
Average Bench 77.6%

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a 12 core 24 thread CPU, currently second only to the 1950X (16 cores, 32 threads) in AMD’s latest Zen-based line for high end desktop processors. Similarly to the 1950X, it has a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz (3.4 GHz for the 1950X) which can boost to a maximum of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. Also, like the other Threadripper CPUs, the 1920X sits on the latest X399 platform. Intel has a number of processors which outperform the 1920X, such as the i5-7600K which is a quarter of the price and offers around 25% better performance than the 1920X for single and quad core usage (most games only use a maximum of four cores). However, the 1920X is squarely aimed at offering value for money to multi-core workstation users and in this category, the 1920X is closer to competing with Intel’s 15% dearer 10 core, 20 thread i9-7900X. The 8 core, 16 thread 1900X, will shortly be available as the third product in the Threadripper line, featuring a slightly higher base clock of 3.8 GHz. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
195,006
10,440
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback