COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80677I57600K
AMD100-100000031BOX
▲ 7418,202 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 9325,558 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Effective Speed 
+10%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,267,645 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
195,006 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 318th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
1,072,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 219th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		75.8 % 83.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
External Data: 1080p 
+8%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki... 		8 % TWarW2 4%, F118 12%, GTAV 8%
Average Score 
+26%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12% 		76.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		120 Pts 133 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+11%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts 259 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		379 Pts 483 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+27%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		403 Pts 792 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+97%
Overclocked Score 
+14%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9% 		87.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		144 Pts +2% 141 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		286 Pts +2% 281 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		490 Pts 546 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+11%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		504 Pts 869 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+72%
Value & Sentiment 
+47%
Market Share
Based on 69,047,169 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.41 % 1.12 % Hugely higher market share.
+173%
Value
Value For Money 		109 % 113 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		74 % 93 % More popular.
+26%
Price
Price (score) 		$75 Cheaper.
+17% 		$90
Nice To Haves 
+68%
Age
Newest 		94 Months 64 Months Much more recent.
+32%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		91 Watts 65 Watts More energy efficient.
+29%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6% 		3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz 4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		510 Pts 1,091 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+114%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		407 Pts 999 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+145%
Specifications 
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM4
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 75.8%
Average Bench 83.1%

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
195,006
1,072,639
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback