COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80677I57600K
AMDFD837EWMHKBOX
▲ 7418,202 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Kaby Lake.
Release date: Q1 2017.

VS
▲ 532,563 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.3GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+27%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 200,645 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
195,006 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 318th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
5,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 53% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 607th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		75.8 % Faster effective speed.
+27% 		59.9 %
Average Score 
+60%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		85.4 Pts +5% 81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		120 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+88% 		63.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+101% 		118 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		379 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+83% 		207 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		403 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+21% 		332 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+62%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.8 Pts +5% 91.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		144 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+90% 		75.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		286 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+101% 		142 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		490 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+95% 		251 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		504 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+19% 		425 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 69,001,993 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.47 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		107 % Hugely better value.
+106% 		51.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		74 % Much more popular.
+40% 		53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$80 Hugely cheaper.
+83% 		$471
Nice To Haves 
+7%
Age
Newest 		94 Months More recent.
+23% 		122 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		91 Watts +4% 95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.8 GHz Faster base frequency.
+15% 		3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.2 GHz 4.3 GHz +2%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		510 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+20% 		426 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		407 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+21% 		336 Pts
Specifications 
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM3+
Series
CPU Architecture 		Kaby Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		HD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 75.8%
Average Bench 59.9%

The i5-7600K targets high end gamers, it sits just behind the flagship i7-7700K in Intel’s Kaby Lake lineup. The 7600K will likely be the most popular gaming CPU of 2017 (some competition from AMD’s upcoming Zen/Ryzen CPUs, would be very welcome). Comparing the 7600K and 6600K shows that the two processors are very closely matched and comparing the 7600K vs the hyper-threaded 7700K highlights the relative strength of the 7700K for workstation performance. There are no significant architectural differences between Kaby Lake and Skylake so, when fully overclocked, the two generations should perform similarly but Kaby Lake offers faster base clocks, improved speed shift technology which helps CPU responsiveness, and better integrated graphics. [Jan '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8370E is an energy efficient Vishera eight core desktop processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. It was launched in September 2014 and is the energy efficient version of the FX-8370 boasting a lower TDP of 95 Watts versus 125 Watts on the FX-8370. Comparing the 8370E and 8370 shows that the lower TDP comes at a cost: the 8370E scores a relatively lacklustre effective speed of 73 compared to the non-E version which scores 83. The lower score is consistent with the relative clock speeds: 3.3 GHz on the 8370E versus 4.0 GHz on the 8370. Priced the same as the 8370, there is a direct choice between being green or speedy. Or, if you don’t really need the above average multi-threaded performance that the 8370E offers, then you may be better off with the superb single-threaded performance from any number of Intel’s offerings. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
195,006
5,639
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback