Intel
IntelAW8063801032301
  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.3 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2015.

VS
About

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.5GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q2 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 133,095 user samples
82,568 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 46% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 25% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
SPEED RANK: 512th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
50,527 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 45% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 21% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 21% Great: 45%
SPEED RANK: 567th / 1206
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
40.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
37.9 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
72.2 Pts +4% 69.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
129 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+8%
120 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
194 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+9%
178 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
197 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+9%
181 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
85 Pts +1% 83.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
156 Pts +4% 150 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
223 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
207 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
224 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+8%
207 Pts
Market Share
Based on 24,746,592 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.39 % Much higher market share.
+62%
0.24 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % 59 % +4%
Age
Newest
52+ Months Much more recent.
+45%
94 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
224 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8%
207 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
198 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+8%
183 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'15 Q2'12
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 AVX
Lithography
Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$281.00 $225.00
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
34.1 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 520 Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
300 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI eDP/DP/HDMI/SDVO/CRT
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1 GHz 1.1 GHz
Package Size
Package Size
42mm X 24mm 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023)
Graphics and IMC Lithography
Graphics and IMC Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
12 1

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

NOT IMPRESS! Compare to a 2 generation older comparable i5 CPU the i5-4250 it's not mush faster (well you wont notice it) What have you done Intel in 22 month!  [Dec '19 Strauby]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i5-3210M is a third generation (Ivy bridge) mobile CPU. Sporting two cores and four threads the 3210M has a maximum turbo clock speed of 3.1 GHz which produces an effective speed of 64.4 or 52% below the modern day group average . For heavily threaded tasks the 3210M is handicapped significantly by its dual core architecture and lags modern CPUs by around 165%. The i5-3210M comes equipped with onboard HD 4000 graphics, which is more than enough for typical desktop use but will struggle with anything but the simplest of 3D games. With a TDP of just 35 Watts the i5-3210M allows for reasonable, but not brilliant, battery life. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback